W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #282: Recommend minimum sizes for protocol elements

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:45:39 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110630124539.GC28441@1wt.eu>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:29:07PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-06-30 12:44, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >...
> >Ditto for squid. Was only waiting a consensus on this thread.
> >
> >413 is currently only sent on too-big request body entities. I think due
> >to interpretation of the old term/words "request entity".
> > ...
> 
> Indeed. If we want to recommend 413 for this, we probably should tune 
> that definition.

Yes, RFC2616 used to introduce many terms which were not that common
and could be interpreted differently from what was expected. "Entity"
certainly was one of these.

Willy
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 12:46:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:42 GMT