W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #231: Considerations for new headers

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:42:14 +1000
Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B4C01B43-2F78-4B71-8342-9388A5CF5DB9@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 30/06/2011, at 5:38 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> On second though, I can see why Amos was confused by ";" and ",". We should clarify the roles of "," and ";", where the latter is frequently used in header fields that use the "parameter" ABNF (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-3.6>).

Yes, I'm still figuring out how to best illustrate the point I'm trying to make; revised proposal soon.

> Indeed, we should encourage authors of new header fields to re-use existing ABNF constructs, so that recipients can re-use parser components.

Yep; that's already an issue <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/266>.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 07:42:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:42 GMT