W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #231: Considerations for new headers

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:40:17 +1000
Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8631CA98-90C1-4543-AE53-394D25B59E4F@mnot.net>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
New headers can't impact caching on their own; if you mean that authors should document how their header might *interact* with caching, certainly.

Cheers,


On 30/06/2011, at 5:37 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <70295C66-3411-4AF7-83E8-775851DACCFB@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
> tes:
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/231>
>> 
>> Proposal:
> 
>> Authors of new header fields are advised to consider documenting:
> 
> * How the header field impacts caching.
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 07:40:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:42 GMT