W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #273: HTTP-Version should be redefined as fixed length pair of DIGIT . DIGIT

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:01:47 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110625080147.GG5307@1wt.eu>
Hi Julian,

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:40:43AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-06-25 00:14, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >Hi Julian,
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:16:26PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >>    The HTTP version number consists of two non-negative decimal digits
> >
> >Since "integer" was changed to "digits" here, maybe we can remove the
> >"non-negative" precision ?
> >...
> 
> Oops. I know I had this right, but somehow it didn't end up in the 
> patch. See updated patch at 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/273/273.diff>.

Another point on wording, should we say "The first number" or "The first digit" ?

The risk of ambiguity is very low, but we're saying that the "HTTP version
number" is composed of two digits, then when we say "the first number", it
might be possible to read it as the HTTP version number composed from the
two digits. I think that talking only about digits removes any doubt :

    The HTTP version number consists of two decimal digits separated by a "." 
    (period or decimal point).  The first digit ("major version") indicates the 
    HTTP messaging syntax, whereas the second digit ("minor version") indicates 
    the highest minor version to which the sender is at least conditionally 
    compliant and able to understand for future communication.

Best regs,
Willy
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2011 08:02:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:41 GMT