W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #290 [was: SHOULD-level requirements in p6-caching]

From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:35:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4DC469AE.50800@gmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 05/06/2011 02:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/6/2011 3:57 PM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>    
>> Is there anything that prevents the Host: field being left out for the assumption of
>> volatile (or no-cache) data is then in effect?
>>      
> Huh?  The Host: header is mandatory in HTTP/1.1, without it the only
> appropriate response is 400.
>    

We are aware of this. That 400 response would be an example of something 
that went out of bounds/scope. Thus, volatile.


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 21:37:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:40 GMT