W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #290 [was: SHOULD-level requirements in p6-caching]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:39:04 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AED76B9B-2771-4B3C-834E-B89415DE6E12@mnot.net>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>

On 04/05/2011, at 9:03 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <783761BA-5934-4621-8908-9A13EE60FB90@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
> tes:
> 
>> So, I'm reluctant to repeat requirements, because we have good reason to =
>> believe that it makes the spec worse, not better.
> 
> I think simply adding:
> 
> 	If there is a Cache-Control header, the Pragma header is ignored.
> 
> Would clarify it even more.

That's not clarifying, that's changing.



--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 12:39:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:40 GMT