- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 11:03:44 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <783761BA-5934-4621-8908-9A13EE60FB90@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >So, I'm reluctant to repeat requirements, because we have good reason to = >believe that it makes the spec worse, not better. I think simply adding: If there is a Cache-Control header, the Pragma header is ignored. Would clarify it even more. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 11:04:07 UTC