W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: #290 [was: SHOULD-level requirements in p6-caching]

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 11:03:44 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <74914.1304507024@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <783761BA-5934-4621-8908-9A13EE60FB90@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
tes:

>So, I'm reluctant to repeat requirements, because we have good reason to =
>believe that it makes the spec worse, not better.

I think simply adding:

	If there is a Cache-Control header, the Pragma header is ignored.

Would clarify it even more.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 11:04:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:40 GMT