- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:51:27 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:01:35AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I like it. Producing it is easy, and there are less special cases for parsing than the format I suggested. Then let's specify all the possible fields. Quite a number of people like to also specify the original destination, and some like to set the original Host header when their reverse-proxies rewrite it before passing on the request. So we could have something like (non exhaustive) : - from - to - proto - host Or maybe even better, let's have all the information available in separate fields for easier parsing : - family (v4/v6) - src4 - src6 - sport - dst4 - dst6 - dport - host - proto Cheers, Willy
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 05:52:27 UTC