W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: I-D draft-petersson-forwarded-for-00.txt

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:37:51 +0000
To: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>
cc: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <43625.1302269871@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20110408151335.33f559c1@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson writes:
>On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:24:02 +0000
>"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>> [1]  From my own brief survey:
>> 	RFC1884 -> 2373         1080::8:800:200C:417A
>> 	RFC1884                 ::13.1.68.3
>> 	RFC1884                 ::FFFF:129.144.52.38
>> 	RFC2133 -> 2133
>> 	RFC2292 -> 3542
>> 	RFC2373 -> 3513
>> 	RFC2428 EPRT |2|1080::8:800:200C:417A|5282|
>> 	RFC2553 -> RFC3493
>> 	RFC2732 -> 3986 http://[3ffe:2a00:100:7031::1]:8080/
>> 	RFC3493 "numeric format"
>> 	RFC3513 -> 4291
>> 	RFC3986 BNF form
>> 	RFC3986 http://[3ffe:2a00:100:7031::1]:8080/
>> 	RFC3986 http://[v%x.????]/
>> 	RFC5952 [2001:db8::1]:80
>
>
>Which RFC do you suggest we refer to in this document?

I think RFC5952 is an attempt to sanitize this area so I don't see
there being any reason but to follow it.  It generally makes
sense and uses "SHOULD" about [...] where port numbers may be
resent.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 13:38:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:39 GMT