W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code

From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:26:33 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTikJWLN3b+F6tszt1O9R8FxW-_AEXhKHXkAHm8wB@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
<snip>
> Personally I'd like to see a concrete proposal how PUT and DELETE will work
> (examples with HTML and HTTP interaction). Right now it's totally not clear
> to me.
>
>> And *where* shod this activity happen?
>> - here
</snip>

Makes sense to me; I'll work up a few examples of HTTP/HTML this
evening and post a link. If/when others do the same we can use them
all as references in any discussion.

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me


#RESTFest 2010
http://rest-fest.googlecode.com




On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 14:14, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 01.04.2011 15:41, mike amundsen wrote:
>>
>> I see the bug has been re-opened.
>>
>> I see there has been some discussion on public-html-comments regarding
>> PUT/DELETE[1].
>> I also note at least one suggestion in that thread was to discuss this
>> on the whatwg list[2].
>>
>> What is the preferred way to proceed here?
>> - List concerns/reservations and deal with them as they come up?
>> - Draw up a straw man proposal (is there a standard format for this)?
>> - Some other process?
>
> Personally I'd like to see a concrete proposal how PUT and DELETE will work
> (examples with HTML and HTTP interaction). Right now it's totally not clear
> to me.
>
>> And *where* shod this activity happen?
>> - here
>
> Here should be fine.
>
>> ...
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 18:27:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:38 GMT