W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized-08.txt> ('Headers-Not-Recognized' HTTP Header Field) to Experimental RFC

From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:29:32 -0500
Message-ID: <4D0B81DC.6040609@att.com>
To: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12/17/2010 9:33 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> 17.12.2010 16:29, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> But clients can't respond with the header, so there's no point in 
>> pretending this applies to them.
> In my document the term 'header' means 'header field' since client are 
> able to put any header to the request and I meant just it.

You might consider changing to using the term header field, since that's 
the more socially acceptable term.

     Tony Hansen
Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 15:30:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:34 GMT