W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Content-Disposition next steps

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:42:36 +0100
Message-ID: <4D09283C.20407@gmx.de>
To: "Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜)" <jungshik@google.com>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jungshik,

On 15.12.2010 21:19, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) wrote:
> ...
> Before rushing to remove it (as an optional 'fallback') , I'd like to
> have some 'numbers' about what web servers do (FYI, some Google products
> emit RFC 2047 for Firefox and Chrome at the moment, but I guess Google
> has to switch over to RFC 5987 for Firefox and Chrome). I'm not sure
> whether the cost of supporting it is larger than the benefit.
> ...

Well, there's an ongoing cost of having many ways to do the same thing, 
each of which not being interoperable.

I believe that of those the RFC 2047 is the worst.

But you are right of course -- data would be great.

Any idea on how long it would take to get this data?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2010 20:43:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:34 GMT