W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-00.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:39:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4D02820C.7020702@gmx.de>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 10.12.2010 20:30, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> ...
>> Also, I really want to avoid giving the impression that Part 7 does
>> recommend or even specify Digest; my understanding is that this will
>> cause massive problems once we'd get to the IESG.
>
> That is probably wise.
>
> Should the document register other schemes like Negotiate?
> ...

And that's another reason.

We haven't decided yet what we want to say about those schemes that seem 
to break HTTP.

If we register them (and I guess we'll have to), we'll have to explain 
what's wrong with them. I'd rather not have that in the base spec.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 19:40:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:33 GMT