- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:00:26 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 01.12.2010 20:50, Adam Barth wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> Adam, do you have a proposal? > > Yeah. Please find my proposal below. It's certainly not beautiful, > and it likely needs more polish, but it should be a starting point. > ... Adam, before I look at the details, I'd like to understand the intent. You're saying this reflects roughly what Chrome is doing. Thanks for writing this down. But exactly *why* would we consider this for the spec (I assume as recommended error recovery?)? I note that you have handling of RFC2047-style encoding in there. That's something only Chrome and Firefox are doing, so I'd like to understand why you think it's needed, and whether you think Opera/Safari/Konqueror/IE should implement that (given the fact that changes the semantics of values that are valid). Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2010 21:01:15 UTC