W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: workability (or otherwise) of HTTP upgrade

From: William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 03:42:32 -0600
Message-ID: <4CF61888.4010105@rowe-clan.net>
To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
On 11/30/2010 7:24 AM, Eric J. Bowman wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> - Uprade to TLS is already defined (although not really used), and 
>> changes the message framing
> 
> I was wondering about that; I've never come across it in the wild, is
> there any data?

Not in a UI-client form that I'm aware of.  Various printer drivers apparently
use this to negotiate secure tunnels to http-aware printers.
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2010 09:43:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:33 GMT