W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:53:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4CDCF26B.2030409@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12.11.2010 05:58, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I'm confused. I thought that we were going to talk about error handling in an appendix, but it appears you're starting to talk about it here.

1) Yes, it should be an appendix.

2) Well, it's parsing advice. It appears that some readers have trouble 
understanding how to derive a parsing strategy from the way how we 
currently write specs, so this is an attempt to describe just that.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 12 November 2010 08:00:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:55 UTC