W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Ticket 260: multiple disposition types, was: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:13:15 +1100
Cc: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A8645CEF-668B-43D3-BD96-ED4538218FD5@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
As with others, I think we have consensus that error handling isn't mandatory, thus WONTFIX. 

On 02/11/2010, at 8:07 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 02.11.2010 09:55, Adam Barth wrote:
>> ...
>>> There is no interop here today, and this doesn't seem to be a problem in
>>> practice.
>> That's a pretty defeatist attitude.  Put another way, four out of five
>> browsers agree: we ought to use the first disposition type.
>> ...
> I'm just saying that there's no unique handling today for an edge case, and even an invalid one.
> As I said before, I'm much more interested in solving the non-edge-case problems first.
> Best regards, Julian

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 02:14:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:33 GMT