On 08/11/2010, at 12:21 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi, > > we introduced this in -12 (see <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/141>), however there's work left to do. > > At least: > > (1) Add "Considerations for new authentication schemes", and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/257 > (2) Something that registers the existing schemes. > > For "Basic" and "Digest" I have prepared draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/export/1078/draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations.html>). This hasn't been submitted yet, because it depends on the -12 drafts, and the submission window for -00 had already closed. > > We can do this starting tomorrow; are we OK with this becoming -00, and add more details and potentially more schemes later on? Seems reasonable. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 01:26:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:33 GMT