W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:19:54 -0700
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20101107161954.27682f56.eric@bisonsystems.net>
Adam Barth wrote:
>
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> >
> > So you claim that user agents need to process invalid headers for
> > market share. But they do not do the same thing. In the absence of
> > a better explanation, my conclusion is that it may not matter.
> >
>
> It does matter.  Please see above.
> 

I believe Julian meant that it may not matter to market share.  You've
pointed out that there's a market-share difference between browsers,
which varies by market, but haven't provided evidence that differences
in Content-Disposition handling accounts for any of it.

-Eric
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 23:20:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:32 GMT