- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:53:09 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 02.11.2010 17:46, Adam Barth wrote: > ... > While I appreciate the implied complement that browser vendors are > good at fixing interoperability and compatibility problems, I think > you're giving us too much credit. For example, my understanding is > that there's a bunch of content in Asia that requires the nutty > %-decoding user-default-charset handling. Because a number of > browsers have effectively chosen not to compete in this marketplace, > they lack this behavior. Therefore lack of unanimity among browsers > doesn't necessarily imply that there isn't existing content that > requires the behavior. > ... So none of Safari/Opera/Firefox is competing there? Maybe those sites just gave up on IE and Chrome, and have been sending filename* to everybody else for a long time? It would *really* be useful to get beyond the hearsay and actually get data. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 16:53:57 UTC