- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:07:17 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:41:14PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > It's not free, as evidenced by the hoops that are being jumped through to try to make sure that it isn't treated like HTTP. No, we're trying to make sure it *is* treated like HTTP even on non completely HTTP compliant stacks which could possibly treat the tunnelled data as HTTP too while they must not. Otherwise, the 101+upgrade perfectly fits the purpose. Willy
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 06:07:51 UTC