W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: #250 / #251 (connect bodies)

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:07:17 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101029060717.GA28692@1wt.eu>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:41:14PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> It's not free, as evidenced by the hoops that are being jumped through to try to make sure that it isn't treated like HTTP.

No, we're trying to make sure it *is* treated like HTTP even on non
completely HTTP compliant stacks which could possibly treat the tunnelled
data as HTTP too while they must not. Otherwise, the 101+upgrade perfectly
fits the purpose.

Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 06:07:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:55 UTC