W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Issue 248: client "Date" requirements

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:56:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4CC15FEB.2050102@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 22.10.2010 00:26, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I think this is reasonable. One editorial niggle: it's easier to scan for this if the paragraph begins with 'clients' as before; e.g.,
>
> "Clients can use the Date header field in requests as well..."
>
> Cheers,
> ...

Yup.

"Clients can use the Date header field as well; in order to keep request 
messages small, they are advised not to include it when it doesn't 
convey any useful information (as it is usually the case for requests 
that do not contain a payload)."

-> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1047>

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 22 October 2010 09:57:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:30 GMT