W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: #233: Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:48:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4CC044C9.4040607@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 19.10.2010 08:21, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/233>
>
> The * URI form is currently specific to OPTIONS, and as discussed has caused a fair amount of pain / confusion.
>
> Does anyone object to disallowing its use with extension methods?

I agree we should disallow it.

BR, Julian

Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 13:49:40 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: Issue 248: client "Date" requirements"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Issue 244 (repeated parameters), was: Working Group Last Call: Content-Disposition"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "#233: Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"
Next in thread: Mark Nottingham: "Re: #233: Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"
Reply: Mark Nottingham: "Re: #233: Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:30 GMT