W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:26:50 -0600
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Gavin Peters (蓋文彼德斯)" <gavinp@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20101018022650.209ba753.eric@bisonsystems.net>
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >I think the only really bad/damaging thing here is starting with an
> >"X-" header.
> Maybe it is time to deprecate the X- convention, as it doesn't seem
> to be working.

"In the future, more top-level types may be defined only by a
standards-track extension to this standard. If another top-level type
is to be used for any reason, it must be given a name starting with
"X-" to indicate its non-standard status and to avoid a potential
conflict with a future official name."


It's RFC 2045 you'd need to change, not HTTP...

Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 08:27:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:55 UTC