W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:25:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4CBBF66F.80705@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "William Chan (ι™ˆζ™Ίζ˜Œ)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 18.10.2010 05:17, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
> I tend to agree, SHOULD vs. MUST here isn't worth a tremendous amount of time. However, if we get agreement among UA implementers on MUST, that does seem the way to go.
>
> Julian, have you put in any text about duplicate content-length values yet?
> ...

No. We wouldn't need it if we stick with SHOULD, right?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 07:26:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:29 GMT