- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:50:39 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> "Clients MAY send a Date header (when a clock is present)". > > This is a bit too brief IMO; the advice about not sending it without a > payload is useful (because it saves bytes, as you noted). Can I also point out that the "(when a clock is present)" part is unnecessary since if it is a MAY any implementor that doesn't have a clock surely will then consider not sending a date or will have another way of figuring out the timestamp to include there... -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 06:51:21 UTC