Re: repeated filename parameters, Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-02

On 02.10.2010 23:48, Adam Barth wrote:
> ...
> There seems to be a lot of things generated by the grammar that are
> nonsensical.  ...
 > ...

Such as?

> ...
> Indeed.  However, this document does not contain the rules for
> consuming the header in sufficient detail for me to implement a user
> agent.  I need to look at another document for that information.
> Sadly, that document doesn't yet exist.
 > ...

You are claiming that it is insufficient to only accept valid headers. 
Please provide evidence, then we have something to discuss.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 12:16:33 UTC