W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:55:11 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vjgcd8qm64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:50:52 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> We cab *allow* it for certain methods, but why allow it for more methods  
> than it's needed for?

Because it is more consistent and will encourage people to use that what  
actually works everywhere and for every method (if they really want that  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 20:55:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 October 2015 05:36:42 UTC