- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:53:14 +0200
- To: "Moore, Jonathan" <jonathan_moore@comcast.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Good point. How about non-5xx status code? On 25/07/2010, at 5:19 PM, Moore, Jonathan wrote: > By successful response, do you mean "received a response successfully" or "received a response with a 2xx response code"? If the former, I think I'd agree, but if the latter, there are definitely non-2xx response codes that would still give an indication that a cached entry wasn't valid anymore (for example, a 404). > > Jon > ........ > Jon Moore > > > On Jul 24, 2010, at 11:22 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > >> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/235> >> >> Any objection to specifying that invalidation only happens upon a successful response (as opposed to any POST/PUT/DELETE/etc. response)? >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >> >> -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 08:53:46 UTC