W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:53:14 +0200
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C5DD6672-3C67-4C95-816B-30C94BFBFBD8@mnot.net>
To: "Moore, Jonathan" <jonathan_moore@comcast.com>
Good point. 

How about non-5xx status code?


On 25/07/2010, at 5:19 PM, Moore, Jonathan wrote:

> By successful response, do you mean "received a response successfully" or "received a response with a 2xx response code"? If the former, I think I'd agree, but if the latter, there are definitely non-2xx response codes that would still give an indication that a cached entry wasn't valid anymore (for example, a 404).
> 
> Jon
> ........
> Jon Moore
> 
> 
> On Jul 24, 2010, at 11:22 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/235>
>> 
>> Any objection to specifying that invalidation only happens upon a successful response (as opposed to any POST/PUT/DELETE/etc. response)?
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 08:53:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:23 GMT