W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:40:22 +0200
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0C2CA3B6-C3B5-4B92-98DD-A6C23EDCB855@mnot.net>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
OPTIONS * or [other method] * ?

OPTIONS * was definitely considered, but it's got implementation problems (while technically possible, it's difficult for average folks to affect the response) and OPTIONS isn't cacheable. 

Cheers,


On 24/07/2010, at 9:10 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:

>> Anyone think we should allow methods other than OPTIONS to use *?
> 
> It's probably jet lag speaking, but was it considered in place of /.well-known/ ?
> 


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 25 July 2010 07:40:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:23 GMT