W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication

From: William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:24:58 -0500
Message-ID: <4C44B49A.4010309@rowe-clan.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
On 7/19/2010 3:13 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 19.07.2010 21:06, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> ...
>>> Proposed
>>> patch:<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/146/>
>>> This makes the default reason phrase for 405 "Method Not Supported",
>>> and also replaces "allowed" by "supported" in the context of 405/Allow.
>> I don't believe that makes any sense.  Why the methods are allowed
>> (or others disallowed) is none of the client's business.  It certainly
>> has nothing to do with "support" (as in implemented).
>> ...
> OK, then we may need a different term. "Allow" has caused people to
> think it has to do with access rights, thus confusing 405 with 403.

What about framing this in terms of Method Not Applicable (which might be
unsupported, unimplemented, or simply nonsensical in the context of this
specific resource), which covers just about everything?
Received on Monday, 19 July 2010 20:25:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:54 UTC