Re: [#193] Trailers and intermediaries

ons 2010-07-14 klockan 15:14 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> Henrik,
> 
> I think a bit more of a change is necessary to get this right;
> 
> > b) the trailer fields consist entirely of optional metadata, and the recipient could use the message (in a manner acceptable to the server where the field originated) without receiving it. In other words, the server that generated the header (often but not always the origin server) is willing to accept the possibility that the trailer fields might be silently discarded along the path to the client.
> 
> Thoughts?

+1. 

Regards
Henrik

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 07:29:35 UTC