W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:10:05 -0700
Cc: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <F2859BC6-2BAA-4DC1-AA62-2508F30C8819@gbiv.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Since we're going on this tangent -
> 
> Is this (proxying other URI schemes through HTTP) worth making a little more explicit? The question of whether non-HTTP URI schemes are allowed in HTTP comes up from time to time. Other issues (e.g., what to do with the Host header) come up as well.

We could add something to the discussion on URIs in p1
or maybe add a dedicated section in p2.

....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 07:10:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:23 GMT