W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet?

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:05:52 +0000
Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <31585969-066D-4BE4-AC92-30713FCF0215@w3.org>
To: nathan@webr3.org

On 2010-03 -15, at 08:49, Nathan wrote:

> Hi Martin,
> I'm actually having a full back track on my thought..
> If a resource is anything that can be named, then I have it's name / can
> describe what it is, so I should stop being lazy and at least give what
> tiny bit of information I know (even if just the name).
> The above may have been the solution I needed all along (gulp)
> Regards,
> Nathan

Sounds like an excellent idea.

<#foo> rdfs:comment "Information about this will be available shortly  --Nathan".

in N3 for example.

Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 11:06:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 October 2015 05:36:38 UTC