- From: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@subbu.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:45:56 -0700
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > Regarding Subbu's 202 suggestion, it's very clever, but both it and > your 204 idea are incompatible with the httpRange-14 rule (endorsed by > the LOD world, IIUC) which says "if an "http" resource responds to a > GET request with a 2xx response, then the resource identified by that > URI is an information resource". [This is very badly expressed - > what's meant is "if an HTTP server responds to a GET request" and so > on - but not difficult to repair.] My interpretation of Nathan's example is that the documentation creation starts in response to a write such as POST, in which 202 is valid. 202 on GET is goofy. Subbu
Received on Sunday, 14 March 2010 22:46:58 UTC