W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:08:59 +0100
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u9e3g9mk64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:52:42 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I can't say that I agree with that reasoning. IMHO interoperability
> going forward is more important than not declaring currently
> conforming implementations non-conforming. If anyone gets really sad
> for loosing their conforming badge, I can send them some home made
> cookies ;)

Yes please! :-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 19:09:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:17 GMT