W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:38:43 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f1003110738we78928at588ce4c4927e3e67@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org> 
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Should we recommend the behavior we see implemented (SHOULD? MUST?)? Note
> that this would make current implementations of Opera and Safari
> non-compliant.

Is there a reason to use SHOULD rather than MUST? If not I'd say use MUST.

/ Jonas
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 15:39:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:17 GMT