Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation

On 04.03.2010 03:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2010, at 12:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Note:
>>
>>    If a header field is absent from a request, it can only match another
>>    request if it is also absent there.
>>
>> Is that still true? I don't think; maybe we can remove the sentence completely?
>
>
> That means we'd have to re-open<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/37>.
>
> I think we can address your concern by doing something like
>
> If (after any normalisation that may take place) a header field is absent from a request...

Works for me; I have updated 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/147/i147.diff> 
accordingly.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 15:48:43 UTC