W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:48:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4B8FD631.4090002@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 04.03.2010 03:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2010, at 12:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Note:
>>
>>    If a header field is absent from a request, it can only match another
>>    request if it is also absent there.
>>
>> Is that still true? I don't think; maybe we can remove the sentence completely?
>
>
> That means we'd have to re-open<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/37>.
>
> I think we can address your concern by doing something like
>
> If (after any normalisation that may take place) a header field is absent from a request...

Works for me; I have updated 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/147/i147.diff> 
accordingly.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 15:48:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:16 GMT