- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:02:48 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> >>> RFC2616 has some MUST-level user interface requirements relating >>> redirecting to unsafe methods: >>> >>> >>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest.html#status.3xx> >>> "The action required may be carried out by the user agent without >>> interaction with the user if and only if the method used in the second >>> request is GET or HEAD." >> >> That's a bug. It should talk about safe methods. Re-opening a very old >> ticket: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/10#comment:5>. >> ... > > Fixed with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/759> -- the > introduction now says: > > "The action required MAY be carried out by the user agent without > interaction with the user if and only if the method used in the second > request is is known to be "safe", as defined in Section 7.1.1." I think you have "is" written twice there. Adam
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 16:03:59 UTC