W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt

From: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:37:30 +0100
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Message-id: <EA551C32-6AC0-4AE1-AB22-0BA8876022C9@mac.com>
To: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@subbu.org>

On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote:

> The usage of fields is not clear. Sec. 6.3 says that "entries in the  
> Link Relation Type Registry can be extended with application- 
> specific data". But the BNF in Sec. 5 does not specify fields. Could  
> you clarify the intent of fields?

I understand fields to be meant as link relation specific parameters.

Jan



>
> Subbu
>
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org
>>> Date: 19 January 2010 4:30:02 PM AEDT
>>> To: mnot@pobox.com, draft-nottingham-http-link- 
>>> header@tools.ietf.org,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com
>>> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link- 
>>> header-07.txt
>>>
>>> New version (-07) has been submitted for draft-nottingham-http- 
>>> link-header-07.txt.
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
>>> Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
>>>
>>> Diff from previous version:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07
>>>
>>> IETF Secretariat.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>
>
>

-----------------------------------
  Jan Algermissen, Consultant

  Mail: algermissen@acm.org
  Blog: http://www.nordsc.com/blog/
  Work: http://www.nordsc.com/
-----------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 07:39:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:16 GMT