- From: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:37:30 +0100
- To: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@subbu.org>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote: > The usage of fields is not clear. Sec. 6.3 says that "entries in the > Link Relation Type Registry can be extended with application- > specific data". But the BNF in Sec. 5 does not specify fields. Could > you clarify the intent of fields? I understand fields to be meant as link relation specific parameters. Jan > > Subbu > > On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org >>> Date: 19 January 2010 4:30:02 PM AEDT >>> To: mnot@pobox.com, draft-nottingham-http-link- >>> header@tools.ietf.org,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com >>> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link- >>> header-07.txt >>> >>> New version (-07) has been submitted for draft-nottingham-http- >>> link-header-07.txt. >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt >>> Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed >>> >>> Diff from previous version: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07 >>> >>> IETF Secretariat. >> >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >> >> > > ----------------------------------- Jan Algermissen, Consultant Mail: algermissen@acm.org Blog: http://www.nordsc.com/blog/ Work: http://www.nordsc.com/ -----------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 07:39:05 UTC