W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses [#174]

From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006072235160.21618@egate.xpasc.com>

Use the 2nd form and save the extra words to make sure "Cache-Control: 
private" is clear if it isn't already.

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Well, most of the proposal is defining what 'explicitly given otherwise' means (and noting the consequences)...
> 
> Which is more clear?
> 
> > Shared caches MUST NOT use a cached response to a request with an Authorization [ref] header to satisfy any subsequent request unless a cache directive that allows such responses to be stored is present in the response.
> 
> or 
> 
> """
> Requests with Authoration [ref] headers MUST have the same effect as Cache-Control: private [ref] on the response.
> """
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 05:37:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:20 GMT