Use the 2nd form and save the extra words to make sure "Cache-Control: private" is clear if it isn't already. On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Well, most of the proposal is defining what 'explicitly given otherwise' means (and noting the consequences)... > > Which is more clear? > > > Shared caches MUST NOT use a cached response to a request with an Authorization [ref] header to satisfy any subsequent request unless a cache directive that allows such responses to be stored is present in the response. > > or > > """ > Requests with Authoration [ref] headers MUST have the same effect as Cache-Control: private [ref] on the response. > """Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 05:37:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:20 GMT