W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: proposal for issue #178

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:07:41 +0200 (CEST)
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006071503520.29826@tvnag.unkk.fr>
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Adrien de Croy wrote:

> I don't see any point in having an integrity check for a message containing 
> only a partial range.  Surely you want to accumulate the entire entity by 
> piecing together all the parts, and then you use the MD5 to check the total.

Imagine downloading a large file in many small chunks from many different 

In the end, you might sit there with a huge file with a bad checksum without 
being able to pinpoint the single small chunk that had the error. So now you 
need to redownload the whole thing again, instead of just regetting the small 
chunk that contained the error.


  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 13:08:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC