W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: #168: understanding CC directives

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:40:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4C0CDAAA.8090900@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
On 03.06.2010 09:06, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2010, at 6:45 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Looks good to me. That being said, I rearranged the sentences and ended up with:
>
> [snip]
>
> Fine by me.

Ok, change applied with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/827>.

>> Ticket 168 furthermore mentions:
>>
>>> Furthermore, the BNF doesn't make it clear that request and response directives shouldn't be intermixed;
>>>
>>>     Cache-Control-v = 1#cache-directive
>>>
>>>     cache-directive = cache-request-directive
>>>
>>>         / cache-response-directive
>>
>> That could be addressed by saying:
>>
>>      Cache-Control-v = 1#cache-request-directive
>>                      / 1#cache-response-directive
>>
>> However, I'm not sure we need to express this as a syntactical constraint (and it also might confuse people with respect to whether this header uses the "list style" or not).
>
>
> Yes; I'm not sure we can really do anything about this, except make sure it's clear in the prose.

Do we really need to say more than we already do?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 11:41:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:20 GMT