W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: http progress notification

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:37:47 -0700
Message-ID: <4BFC513B.6030502@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Adrien de Croy wrote:
> On 26/05/2010 4:12 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>> You really really should choose a free status code; 102 has been 
>> defined in RFC 2518.
> [...] it was discussed that the existing webdav 102 status could be an 
> appropriate code - in other words that the Progress response header 
> could be an application for it.

'102 Processing' seems like a very good fit to me (but not 102 OK / 
Progress / Info), provided that you extend the existing definition in a 
compatible way.

Thanks and Regards,
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 22:38:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:19 GMT