W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:31:44 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1274711504.2559.23.camel@localhost>
mån 2010-05-24 klockan 09:57 -0400 skrev Dan Winship:

> You definitely still see 2-digit years in Set-Cookie headers,

noted, but that's currently outside the HTTPbis specifications.

To precise my question:

Anyone seen a noticeable use of 2-digit dates used in any headers
covered by the HTTPbis specifications in the last years? And have thse
been otherwise correctly formed dates?

I have seen 2-digit dates some times, but from what I can remember those
have generally been malformed in other aspects as well using either
wrong timezone, localized day/month names etc.

Received on Monday, 24 May 2010 14:32:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC