W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Issue 209, was: [new issue] p1 messaging 4.2. fails to account for requested scheme which impacts http compared to https

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 16:15:19 +0200
Message-ID: <4BF543F7.2050601@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 19.05.2010 21:55, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> should we cover this gap?
> Probably should include something about the port which the request was
> received on here, as is done by most known server implementations.

Yes. This is a bug.

It's *related* to issue 196 which defines the Effective Request URI 
(where the proposal already takes http vs https into account). Of course 
the "identified/addressed resource" and the "effective request URI" 
definitions need to be consistent.

Now ticket 209 (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/209>)

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 14:16:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC