- From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:49:46 +0200
- To: Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
lör 2010-05-15 klockan 08:19 -0700 skrev Bil Corry: > Julian Reschke wrote on 5/9/2010 6:36 AM: > > The only *new* registry that we added before is for method names, and > > indeed we have the registrations for all non-HTTP/1.1 methods in a > > separate document > > (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-latest.html>). > > Shouldn't it also include the HTTP methods as well? Or am I misunderstanding its purpose? Those are currently added by the HTTPbis specifications. But I share your view. The methods defined by 2616 should be in the initial registry registration referencing RFC2616 so the registry can be established without needing to wait for the bulk of the HTTPbis specifications. Regards Henrik
Received on Saturday, 15 May 2010 17:50:19 UTC