W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ticket 208, Re: RFC 5861 on HTTP Cache-Control Extensions for Stale Content

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:49:46 +0200
To: Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1273945786.6739.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
lör 2010-05-15 klockan 08:19 -0700 skrev Bil Corry:
> Julian Reschke wrote on 5/9/2010 6:36 AM: 
> > The only *new* registry that we added before is for method names, and
> > indeed we have the registrations for all non-HTTP/1.1 methods in a
> > separate document
> > (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-latest.html>).
> Shouldn't it also include the HTTP methods as well?  Or am I misunderstanding its purpose?

Those are currently added by the HTTPbis specifications.

But I share your view. The methods defined by 2616 should be in the
initial registry registration referencing RFC2616 so the registry can be
established without needing to wait for the bulk of the HTTPbis

Received on Saturday, 15 May 2010 17:50:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC