W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ticket 208, Re: RFC 5861 on HTTP Cache-Control Extensions for Stale Content

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 15:03:11 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1273410191.8670.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
fre 2010-05-07 klockan 16:24 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:

> (We still need to figure out how to get RFC 5861's extensions into the 
> registry.)

What about running the IANA registry requests as separate RFCs just for
establishing the registries? This is at large a separate activity from
HTTPbis in general and should not be blocked waiting on HTTPbis to
complete. And in addition it's for normative reasons undesired to have
HTTPbis standard document declare references to all prior documents
which should have their values included in the registry.

Or how have the process been for other registries being established late
after the field have been in use and extended?

Received on Sunday, 9 May 2010 13:03:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC