W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Issue 101, was: Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:31:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4BBB37BE.40800@gmx.de>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, nathan@webr3.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 06.04.2010 15:11, Yves Lafon wrote:
> ...
> Yes, semantic equivalence is at best fuzzy, and a property that only an
> application (server or client) can try to address. Better wordings
> welcomed :)
> ...

Indeed; and we have a separate ticket for *that*: 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/101>.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:32:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:17 GMT