W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ]

From: Brett Slatkin <brett@haxor.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:33:53 +0000
Message-ID: <966f8bd30909202119i69c59e8p9bc997aacbe3c5d6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
>> I can't seem to find any reference to the "monitor" relation type
>> anywhere. Could you pass me a link to it?
> See:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe
> with a mailing list at:
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-http-events

Ah okay, that's helpful. That SIP subscription spec does have some
similar elements to PubSubHubbub (e.g., fat pings), but it's heavily
reliant on SIP for its mechanics. I'd like to think that what we're
trying to define here with PSHB is a simpler, more stand-alone
publish/subscribe protocol over simple HTTP. PSHB's current reliance
on Atom/RSS is to promote bootstrapping of a common use-case, but
isn't necessary long-term.

Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 08:19:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:51 UTC